UMassLowell
W-L: ( 2-10) PR = 84.2746Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 206 H Quinnipiac ( 5-10, 86.4) 12-15 214 A Mercyhurst ( 2-12, 81.2) 14-13 221 H Wagner ( 5- 8, 83.5) 16- 7 303 A UMass (10- 5, 92.1) 8-18 310 N Queens ( 4- 9, 84.5) 5- 8 314 A Binghamton ( 2-11, 85.6) 9-16 317 A Brown ( 6- 7, 92.5) 6-13 328 H Albany ( 9- 5, 92.1) 7-13 404 H UMBC ( 6- 6, 89.5) 4-18 411 A NJIT ( 4- 9, 87.4) 8-10 418 H Vermont ( 6- 6, 90.6) 10-14 425 A Bryant ( 7- 5, 88.7) 7-11
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
206 H Quinnipiac 12-15 -3 -1 - -2.24
214 A Mercyhurst 14-13 1 2 -0.71
221 H Wagner 16- 7 9 2 ++ 4.92
303 A UMass 8-18 -10 -9 0.00
310 N Queens 5- 8 -3 0 - -2.76
314 A Binghamton 9-16 -7 -3 -- -4.33
317 A Brown 6-13 -7 -10 0.00
328 H Albany 7-13 -6 -6 0.50
404 H UMBC 4-18 -14 -4 - -3.12
411 A NJIT 8-10 -2 -4 + 2.47
418 H Vermont 10-14 -4 -5 1.03
425 A Bryant 7-11 -4 -6 1.73
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 314 A Binghamton 9-16 -7 -3 -- -4.33 206 H Quinnipiac 12-15 -3 -1 - -2.24 310 N Queens 5- 8 -3 0 - -2.76 404 H UMBC 4-18 -14 -4 - -3.12 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 221 H Wagner 16- 7 9 2 ++ 4.92 411 A NJIT 8-10 -2 -4 + 2.47 |
UMassLowell Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air Force | Air Force | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Air Force | |
| Albany | Albany | Albany | ||
| Army | Army | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Army | |
| Bellarmine | Bellarmine | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | Bellarmine | |
| Binghamton | Binghamton | Binghamton | ||
| Boston Univ | Boston Univ | Boston Univ | ||
| Brown | Brown | Brown | ||
| Bryant | Bryant | Bryant | ||
| Bucknell | Bucknell | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Bucknell | |
| Canisius | Canisius | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Canisius | |
| Cleveland St | Cleveland St | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Cleveland St | |
| Colgate | Colgate | Colgate | ||
| Cornell | Cornell | Cornell 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Dartmouth | Dartmouth | insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) | Dartmouth | |
| Delaware | Delaware | Delaware 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Denver | Denver | Denver | ||
| Detroit | Detroit | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Detroit | |
| Drexel | Drexel | insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) | Drexel | |
| Duke | Duke | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Duke | |
| Fairfield | Fairfield | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Fairfield | |
| Georgetown | Georgetown | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Georgetown | |
| Hampton | UMassLowell | UMassLowell 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Harvard | Harvard | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Harvard | |
| High Point | High Point | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | High Point | |
| Hobart | Hobart | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) | Hobart | |
| Hofstra | Hofstra | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Hofstra | |
| Holy Cross | Holy Cross | Holy Cross | ||
| Iona | UMassLowell | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) | UMassLowell | |
| Jacksonville | Jacksonville | Jacksonville 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| JHU | JHU | JHU | ||
| Lafayette | Lafayette | Lafayette 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Le Moyne | Le Moyne | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) | Le Moyne | |
| Lehigh | Lehigh | Lehigh | ||
| LIU | LIU | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 3- 0) | LIU | |
| Loyola | Loyola | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Loyola | |
| Manhattan | Manhattan | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | Manhattan | |
| Marist | Marist | Marist 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Marquette | Marquette | Marquette | ||
| Maryland | Maryland | Maryland | ||
| UMass | UMass | UMass | ||
| Mercer | Mercer | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Mercer | |
| Mercyhurst | UMassLowell | UMassLowell | ||
| Merrimack | Merrimack | insuffient: ( 0- 3)( 1- 2) | Merrimack | |
| Michigan | Michigan | Michigan | ||
| Monmouth | Monmouth | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Monmouth | |
| Mt St Marys | Mt St Marys | insuffient: ( 0- 3)( 1- 2) | Mt St Marys | |
| Navy | Navy | Navy | ||
| NJIT | NJIT | NJIT | ||
| No Carolina | No Carolina | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | No Carolina | |
| Notre Dame | Notre Dame | Notre Dame | ||
| Ohio State | Ohio State | Ohio State | ||
| Pennsylvania | Pennsylvania | Pennsylvania 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Penn St | Penn St | Penn St | ||
| Princeton | Princeton | Princeton 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Providence | Providence | Providence 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Queens | Queens | Queens | ||
| Quinnipiac | Quinnipiac | Quinnipiac | ||
| Richmond | Richmond | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Richmond | |
| Rob Morris | Rob Morris | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Rob Morris | |
| Rutgers | Rutgers | Rutgers | ||
| Sacred Heart | Sacred Heart | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) | Sacred Heart | |
| Siena | Siena | Siena 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| St Bonnies | St Bonnies | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) | St Bonnies | |
| St Johns | St Johns | insuffient: ( 0- 4)( 1- 3) | St Johns | |
| St Josephs | St Josephs | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | St Josephs | |
| Stony Brook | Stony Brook | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Stony Brook | |
| Syracuse | Syracuse | Syracuse | ||
| Towson | Towson | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Towson | |
| UMBC | UMBC | UMBC | ||
| Utah | Utah | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Utah | |
| Vermont | Vermont | Vermont | ||
| Villanova | Villanova | Villanova | ||
| Virginia | Virginia | Virginia | ||
| VMI | VMI | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 3- 0) | VMI | |
| Wagner | UMassLowell | UMassLowell | ||
| Yale | Yale | Yale 2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
PowerWise = 4
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 13.40
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
22 H Quinnipiac ( 5-10, 86.4) 12-15 -13.54 7.75 -1.32 1.12 -8.30
22 A Mercyhurst ( 2-12, 81.2) 14-13 -18.65 2.64 1.32 1.12 8.85
7 H Wagner ( 5- 8, 83.5) 16- 7 -16.39 4.90 -1.32 1.12 8.00
4 A UMass (10- 5, 92.1) 8-18 -7.79 13.50 1.32 1.12 -3.61
25 N Queens ( 4- 9, 84.5) 5- 8 -15.39 5.90 -0.00 1.12 -8.59
10 A Binghamton ( 2-11, 85.6) 9-16 -14.28 7.01 1.32 1.12 -7.24
17 A Brown ( 6- 7, 92.5) 6-13 -7.44 13.85 1.32 1.12 -3.42
2 H Albany ( 9- 5, 92.1) 7-13 -7.81 13.48 -1.32 1.12 -5.10
24 H UMBC ( 6- 6, 89.5) 4-18 -10.42 10.87 -1.32 1.12 -6.56
21 A NJIT ( 4- 9, 87.4) 8-10 -12.47 8.82 1.32 1.12 -6.23
7 H Vermont ( 6- 6, 90.6) 10-14 -9.27 12.02 -1.32 1.12 -5.91
6 A Bryant ( 7- 5, 88.7) 7-11 -11.22 10.07 1.32 1.12 -5.53
------
-43.64
|
winning pts = 16.8458 losing points = -60.4856
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------